intention-review
As course co-coordinators we expected to learn more about how to run a course in peeragogy
We expected the participants to learn more peer learning and peer production
Develop a “product” or focus for peeragogy, “what does it do?”
Participants and co-coordinators figure out “What’s in it for me?” with peeragogy and the course itself
what-happened
HOW: Video conferencing – allows for global participation
Open source ethos – Hermano Cintra
Business orientation – Vitor Bruno
Get practical/aka no mo’ navel gazing – Charlotte Pierce
Building the syllabus taught me how to make a Markdown document in GitHub – Charlie Danoff
what-happened-perspectives
I felt like we made a lot of great memories and co-created some wonderful learning moments – Charlie Danoff
Gave some structure to my day/week – Charlotte Pierce
Unlike other meetings, I never dreaded these
learnings-changes
Accept “newcomers” – Hermano Cintra, Vitor Bruno
We weren’t always “prepared” :-o
We “kept going”
Organized on calendar (session 6/8, etc.)
Decided on one place to take notes – in this case it was the Zoom chat
Use of other platforms does not need to be disruptive. But it does help to have a central one that others feed into. Synchronizing different apps and platforms remains an ongoing challenge.
what-else-should-change-going-forward
Develop system to encourage participation
Maybe circulate agenda/outline for comment a few days before course session
Develop system for “getting the word out” and onboarding if it brings in new people
Map out a better definition of the course – along the lines of Joe’s for Tufts pilot
Update Rheingoldian meeting roles to have “primary” ones that should be filled first and “nice to have”
Update the Peeragogical Action Review to account for use during an activity itself or after its completed