intention-review
Sharing contributed texts from Paola Ricaurte, Charlie Danoff, and Joe Corneli, and revising them
what-happened
We redid the introduction
We verbally read texts and made edits and rearrangements
We now have a main thesis for the paper!
Ray Puzio added a bit of text collecting historical background material
We revised our outline
what-happened-perspectives
Charlie Danoff was sad to show up late, but was very impressed with how much progress had been made during the meeting when he arrived!
Joe Corneli appreciated Paola Ricaurte’s and Charlie Danoff’s contributed texts!
learnings-changes
We learned a little about patterns and health (it looks like this is an under-developed use case for design patterns)
We think there are probably lots of under-developed
Use the word “mitigate” instead of “ameliorate” because it is less of a weasel-word and more understandable. It’s more active.
Connection to the ongoing discussion about platforms in the mailing list
Use AOB to think about 5
what-else-should-change-going-forward
Ray Puzio should revise historical background section, and some info about scenario planning
Analua Dutka-Chirichetti and Charlie Danoff should add case studies
Everybody should answer: Are there areas crying out for a reference? Try to use APA style (and please make sure the bibliography doc stays up to date, this is in the folder “annotated bibliography” which includes a file with the same title.)
Paola Ricaurte should revise the references (APA format) in Peeragogy Patterns (section 3)
Joe Corneli should work on Tufts 2.0 proposal… Maybe this can also be a short case study for this paper.
Charlotte Pierce needs another time because Friday doesn’t work
Charlie Danoff should Meta-Wrap! Wrap the Wrap!